This PR primarily focuses on upbringing constexpr maps for handlers.
Each time an HLE object of a service is construed, it registers it's own handlers, over and over.
Regardless of whetever it needs them at the moment or not.
Additionally we don't require to keep track of different function pointers amongst each object.
This can be done by overriding the given function instead, as opposed to having a separate
hash map for every given object.
In other words: Remove handlers (and handlers_tipc) map for every instance
then read from a static defined per-class.
- [x] Migrate all HLE functions to new `frozen::map` constexpr time finder
- [ ] Measure if this approach actually makes better codegen
Optional:
- [x] Properly gate all functions (that have versions commented next to them)
- [x] Maybe store `HandlerFnP<>` and `const char*` separately, version gating can go in a different map as well
Information such as name can be used on debug builds, but doesn't particularly help on release as one can consult an external reference (or have an annotated IPC map)
Signed-off-by: lizzie <lizzie@eden-emu.dev>
- [x] I have read and followed the [Contribution Guidelines](https://git.eden-emu.dev/eden-emu/eden/src/branch/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#code-contributions).
- [x] I have read and followed the [AI Policy](https://git.eden-emu.dev/eden-emu/eden/src/branch/master/docs/policies/AI.md)
- [x] I have read and followed the [Coding Guidelines](https://git.eden-emu.dev/eden-emu/eden/src/branch/master/docs/policies/Coding.md) to the best of my ability.
-------------------
Co-authored-by: Maufeat <sahyno1996@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git.eden-emu.dev/eden-emu/eden/pulls/4480
Reviewed-by: Maufeat <sahyno1996@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: MaranBr <maranbr@eden-emu.dev>
Contains the minimal set of functionalities to allow tico installer succeed, and tico work normally EXCEPT for game launching (which me or someone else will investigate later)
First three commits are from PR 4012.
The other six, kinda dizzy to explain each one. All were implemented based on tico source, switchbrew and libnx.
Hopefully the commit messages will do.
Reviewed-on: https://git.eden-emu.dev/eden-emu/eden/pulls/4086
Reviewed-by: Lizzie <lizzie@eden-emu.dev>
Reviewed-by: Maufeat <sahyno1996@gmail.com>
This formats all copyright comments according to SPDX formatting guidelines.
Additionally, this resolves the remaining GPLv2 only licensed files by relicensing them to GPLv2.0-or-later.
When a destructor isn't defaulted into a cpp file, it can cause the use
of forward declarations to seemingly fail to compile for non-obvious
reasons. It also allows inlining of the construction/destruction logic
all over the place where a constructor or destructor is invoked, which
can lead to code bloat. This isn't so much a worry here, given the
services won't be created and destroyed frequently.
The cause of the above mentioned non-obvious errors can be demonstrated
as follows:
------- Demonstrative example, if you know how the described error happens, skip forwards -------
Assume we have the following in the header, which we'll call "thing.h":
\#include <memory>
// Forward declaration. For example purposes, assume the definition
// of Object is in some header named "object.h"
class Object;
class Thing {
public:
// assume no constructors or destructors are specified here,
// or the constructors/destructors are defined as:
//
// Thing() = default;
// ~Thing() = default;
//
// ... Some interface member functions would be defined here
private:
std::shared_ptr<Object> obj;
};
If this header is included in a cpp file, (which we'll call "main.cpp"),
this will result in a compilation error, because even though no
destructor is specified, the destructor will still need to be generated by
the compiler because std::shared_ptr's destructor is *not* trivial (in
other words, it does something other than nothing), as std::shared_ptr's
destructor needs to do two things:
1. Decrement the shared reference count of the object being pointed to,
and if the reference count decrements to zero,
2. Free the Object instance's memory (aka deallocate the memory it's
pointing to).
And so the compiler generates the code for the destructor doing this inside main.cpp.
Now, keep in mind, the Object forward declaration is not a complete type. All it
does is tell the compiler "a type named Object exists" and allows us to
use the name in certain situations to avoid a header dependency. So the
compiler needs to generate destruction code for Object, but the compiler
doesn't know *how* to destruct it. A forward declaration doesn't tell
the compiler anything about Object's constructor or destructor. So, the
compiler will issue an error in this case because it's undefined
behavior to try and deallocate (or construct) an incomplete type and
std::shared_ptr and std::unique_ptr make sure this isn't the case
internally.
Now, if we had defaulted the destructor in "thing.cpp", where we also
include "object.h", this would never be an issue, as the destructor
would only have its code generated in one place, and it would be in a
place where the full class definition of Object would be visible to the
compiler.
---------------------- End example ----------------------------
Given these service classes are more than certainly going to change in
the future, this defaults the constructors and destructors into the
relevant cpp files to make the construction and destruction of all of
the services consistent and unlikely to run into cases where forward
declarations are indirectly causing compilation errors. It also has the
plus of avoiding the need to rebuild several services if destruction
logic changes, since it would only be necessary to recompile the single
cpp file.
* Updated ACC with more service names
* Updated SVC with more service names
* Updated set with more service names
* Updated sockets with more service names
* Updated SPL with more service names
* Updated time with more service names
* Updated vi with more service names
PavelBARABANOV
lizzie
xbzk
Morph
german77
zkitx
Lioncash
VolcaEM
Hexagon12
mailwl